During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
В России предупредили о подготовке ВСУ к контратаке на одном направлении08:42
。纸飞机下载对此有专业解读
符正平向南方周末记者解释，在自贸区建设走过十余年后，部分开放体量更大、开放效果更好的省份已然面临着现有自贸区建设范围的限制，对它们来说，“十五五”时期也会是一个提质增效的重要时间窗口。
17-летнюю дочь Николь Кидман высмеяли в сети за нелепую походку на модном показе20:47