Yeah, you’d need real automation, real standardization, or some kind of massive process innovation, like a whole new way to make things. And then it would just kind of negate a labor advantage, because it wouldn’t really create a lot of net new jobs. So many of those jobs would just be automated.
The industry data tells a consistent story of volume outrunning quality. CircleCI’s 2026 report measured the largest year-over-year jump in feature branch activity they’ve ever seen, up 59%, yet main branch deployments fell and build success hit a five-year low. Nearly 3 in 10 merges to main are now failing. Faros AI’s telemetry across 10,000+ developers says teams with high AI adoption merged 98% more PRs but also that review time ballooned 91%. The reviews aren’t disappearing. The attention behind them is thinning. And it turns out AI doesn’t automatically help on this side of the equation either. Meta found that showing AI-generated patches to reviewers actually increased review time. They say it’s because reviewers felt obligated to verify the AI’s work on top of their own, but I’ve seen many other reasons for similar or higher increase in review time for AI-assisted work.。WhatsApp Web 網頁版登入对此有专业解读
I was inspired by Naughty Dog's use of Game Oriented Assembly Lisp, GOOL, and Racket/Scheme (on their modern titles). I've also taken several ideas from Jonathan Blow's talks on Jai.，推荐阅读手游获取更多信息
——李丹代表（四川省司法厅党委书记、厅长）